In Kenya, the decision to run for governorship versus becoming a Member of Parliament (MP) depends on personal goals, political strategy, and the impact one seeks to make. However, here are several compelling reasons why someone might choose to go for a governorship position instead of becoming an MP during elections:
1. Executive Power and Direct Control
-
Governors are the chief executives of their counties and have direct control over county resources, personnel, and development agendas.
-
MPs, on the other hand, are lawmakers and have limited executive power.
2. Bigger Budget and Resource Allocation
-
Governors manage billions of shillings through the County Treasury and are in charge of implementing projects directly.
-
MPs primarily handle the NG-CDF (National Government Constituencies Development Fund), which is much smaller and has restricted use.
3. Wider Jurisdiction and Influence
-
A governor oversees an entire county, which can include several constituencies, making their political reach and influence broader.
-
An MP only represents one constituency, limiting their jurisdiction and political influence.
4. Legacy and Visibility
-
Governors can leave a visible legacy through large-scale development projects such as roads, hospitals, and infrastructure.
-
MPs mainly legislate and have less control over project implementation, making it harder to build a tangible legacy.
5. Political Growth and Ambition
-
Serving as a governor can position someone for national leadership roles, such as Deputy President or even President.
-
MPs can also grow politically, but governors typically gain more executive experience, which is seen as essential for higher office.
6. Autonomy and Cabinet Appointments
-
Governors form their own county executive committees (CECs) and have autonomy in appointments.
-
MPs have no such powers and are mainly involved in national law-making and oversight.
7. Closer to the People in Development
-
Governors deal directly with service delivery, healthcare, agriculture, trade, and infrastructure—areas that affect daily lives.
-
MPs mainly handle national policy, debate, and oversight, which may seem distant from local, everyday concerns.
However, it's worth noting:
-
Governorship is more demanding and highly scrutinized.
-
Corruption investigations and accountability pressures are greater.
-
MPs can influence national laws and policies, which may suit those interested in legislative reforms or national debates.
Conclusion:
Go for governorship if you want executive power, broader influence, control over county development, and a higher leadership profile.
Go for MP if you are passionate about lawmaking, national discourse, or starting your political career with a smaller constituency focus.
Would you like help comparing specific counties or constituencies?
0 Comments