Contact

GOVERNOR OR MP? A STRATEGIC CHOICE FOR KENYA'S FUTURE LEADERS

By | May 30, 2025

In Kenya, the decision to run for governorship versus becoming a Member of Parliament (MP) depends on personal goals, political strategy, and the impact one seeks to make. However, here are several compelling reasons why someone might choose to go for a governorship position instead of becoming an MP during elections:


1. Executive Power and Direct Control

  • Governors are the chief executives of their counties and have direct control over county resources, personnel, and development agendas.

  • MPs, on the other hand, are lawmakers and have limited executive power.


2. Bigger Budget and Resource Allocation

  • Governors manage billions of shillings through the County Treasury and are in charge of implementing projects directly.

  • MPs primarily handle the NG-CDF (National Government Constituencies Development Fund), which is much smaller and has restricted use.


3. Wider Jurisdiction and Influence

  • A governor oversees an entire county, which can include several constituencies, making their political reach and influence broader.

  • An MP only represents one constituency, limiting their jurisdiction and political influence.


4. Legacy and Visibility

  • Governors can leave a visible legacy through large-scale development projects such as roads, hospitals, and infrastructure.

  • MPs mainly legislate and have less control over project implementation, making it harder to build a tangible legacy.


5. Political Growth and Ambition

  • Serving as a governor can position someone for national leadership roles, such as Deputy President or even President.

  • MPs can also grow politically, but governors typically gain more executive experience, which is seen as essential for higher office.


6. Autonomy and Cabinet Appointments

  • Governors form their own county executive committees (CECs) and have autonomy in appointments.

  • MPs have no such powers and are mainly involved in national law-making and oversight.


7. Closer to the People in Development

  • Governors deal directly with service delivery, healthcare, agriculture, trade, and infrastructure—areas that affect daily lives.

  • MPs mainly handle national policy, debate, and oversight, which may seem distant from local, everyday concerns.


However, it's worth noting:

  • Governorship is more demanding and highly scrutinized.

  • Corruption investigations and accountability pressures are greater.

  • MPs can influence national laws and policies, which may suit those interested in legislative reforms or national debates.


Conclusion:

Go for governorship if you want executive power, broader influence, control over county development, and a higher leadership profile.
Go for MP if you are passionate about lawmaking, national discourse, or starting your political career with a smaller constituency focus.

Would you like help comparing specific counties or constituencies?

How we report

We name our sources and publish corrections. Read our editorial standards or see something wrong? Check our corrections page.